[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Using APACHE_2_0_BRANCH not HEAD was Re: recent apr change?

From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz_at_apache.org>
Date: 2003-01-06 20:17:58 CET

--On Monday, January 6, 2003 1:05 PM -0600 Ben Collins-Sussman
<sussman@collab.net> wrote:

> We're releasing svn 0.16.1 later today. We're going to test against
> the latest httpd-2.1/apr tarball, which we'll upload to the svn site
> (so that it doesn't disappear.) This will allow branko's UTF8 stuff
> and jerenkrantz' mod-dav locknig stuff to work correctly.

Oh, hmm, I forgot about that.

I think you might be better off if you use APACHE_2_0_BRANCH of httpd
and HEAD of apr. HEAD of httpd has some weird stuff in it right now.
I wouldn't consider the mod_dav_lock stuff essential. mod_dav_svn
should work just fine without it - provided that the ap_provider API
is present.

Feel free to also revert the commit to mod_dav_svn that calls
ap_lookup_provider just for that tag if you like. Or, however you'd
do that in subversion. I'm not really sure. =) It'd be a good
exercise, methinks. (Actually, how would you do this?) -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jan 6 20:18:47 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.