Re: svn 1.0 in 2006 or now?
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-01-03 18:47:37 CET
solo turn <soloturn99@yahoo.com> writes:
> - you seem to be in the same situation as jim blandy,
Karl's point is that we're trying to *avoid* what happened to Jim.
> (add -R choking for existing files/dirs for example,
Sorry, can you explain this? What issue is this?
> and karl is trying to avoid jim's beta experience ...
Actually, no, we've defined "beta" as "no known bugs". This is a
> not going beta is bad for everybody. new features can't be
I feel like this is going in circles. You seem to repeatedly point
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.