-- "Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman@collab.net> wrote:
> I feel like this is going in circles. You seem to repeatedly point
> out all the harms that come from delaying labels. Our position is
> that much *more* harm will come by labelling things too early.
yes ... it looks terribly like a circle ... you think you are right
and i think you are jim-blandy-blind in this respect ... and at the
end you win :)
may i help with what i know best? am i allowed to do release
management here? then it does not take the time of 4 highly qualified
developpers to do this dummy job. this is pure waste ...
it will be like:
- beta with the mentioned and
0.17 issues fixed
- no new features or architectureal
changes in the 1.0 branch
- 1.0 after 1-2 month beta
- target date 1.4.2002
- if necessary, separate out the
bindings
fitz, its then me who gets the blame for too early, and its you as
developper for the good product. a fair distribution.
the other possibility is: we make a bet.
if you don't change your strategy and you have 1.0 earlier than mid
2004, i pay you a beer per month you are earlier. this holds even if
you know that there is a bet ;))
feel free to pay me a beer for every month you are late ....
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jan 3 21:45:56 2003