Re: Problems building 0.16 under OSX 10.2.2

leif.eriksen@hpa.com.au writes:
> So I recommend that the 'new' 0.16 be released as 0.16.1 (or 0.16a or
> anything that marks it as 'different' and 'superior'). That way there'll be
> no confusion as to which version of 0.16 someone is talking about.
>
> Of course its easy for me to make recommendations - I don't actually have to
> do anything!

If it had been anything more than an hour or two, I'd agree. But in
this case, the old release was pulled so quickly that hardly anyone
had time to get it -- and those who did are probably on this list :-).

So in general, yes, but we needn't bother here. Especially since if
someone *does* succeed in building their 0.16, it means that they
either worked around the build artifacts or got the second tarball
(i.e., the Subversion code is not affected either way).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 5 04:26:44 2002