[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Problems building 0.16 under OSX 10.2.2

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-12-05 03:48:38 CET

leif.eriksen@hpa.com.au writes:
> So I recommend that the 'new' 0.16 be released as 0.16.1 (or 0.16a or
> anything that marks it as 'different' and 'superior'). That way there'll be
> no confusion as to which version of 0.16 someone is talking about.
> Of course its easy for me to make recommendations - I don't actually have to
> do anything!

If it had been anything more than an hour or two, I'd agree. But in
this case, the old release was pulled so quickly that hardly anyone
had time to get it -- and those who did are probably on this list :-).

So in general, yes, but we needn't bother here. Especially since if
someone *does* succeed in building their 0.16, it means that they
either worked around the build artifacts or got the second tarball
(i.e., the Subversion code is not affected either way).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Dec 5 04:26:44 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.