Re: svn --version should give: 0.15.0 (build <revision>)

John Barstow wrote:

>>Most people that use Subversion in a production environment will build
>>
>>
>>from a tarball, which *does* have a revision number instead of "(dev
>
>
>>build)".
>>
>>
>
>I don't know you can safely say that. I'm doing daily builds in my
>production environment right now, mostly because critical issues are still
>being fixed.
>At least until some point revision after 1.0 ships, I think you'll have lots
>of people doing the same thing.
>+1 on including the revision number.
>
>John C Barstow
>
>

Well for gods' sakes, we already _have_ a script that inserts the
revision number into SVN_VER_TAG, don't we? Isn't that what dist.sh
does? There's nothing wrong with using that to prepare the sources for a
baselined build.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org