Re: nts -> cstring?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> I happen to find "cstring" a more readable convention (it wasn't at
> all clear to me at first that "nts" stood for "null-terminated string"
> and not some ISO time concept, when I first saw svn_time_to_nts). Are
> there any -1s on renaming the last five _nts functions to _cstring
> functions?

Quite the opposite -- +1, I think it's clearer too.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 20 16:51:44 2002