Re: Changing the way the server looks for hooks

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-11-12 22:17:33 CET

Noel Yap <yap_noel@yahoo.com> writes:
> OTOH, I see little need to be able to specify more
> than one executable per hook. For example, being able
> to supply the name of one and only one pre-commit
> script should be sufficient for most (if not all)
> requirements for a pre-commit script.

That's what I was thinking, yah...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 12 22:51:33 2002

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Karl Fogel: "One unclaimed 0.16 issue... David Kimdon, want it?"
Previous message: Philip Martin: "Re: svn status: does not notice changed file if timestamp of "new" file is older"
In reply to: Noel Yap: "Re: Changing the way the server looks for hooks"
Next in thread: Branko Čibej: "Re: Changing the way the server looks for hooks"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]