Re: Issue #872 -- who wants to do it?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:38:34PM +0100, Branko Cibej wrote:
>...
> That's why I'd still go with GNU libiconv. However, I'm 99% certain that
> patches for APR t natively support GNU libiconv won't be accepted, se
> we'd have to roll our own APR on Windows.

*optionally* using iconv should be no problem. It just gets hairy when you
require the thing. I don't see a reason that patches for optional linkage
would be rejected...

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org