Ich Selbst wrote:
> Or what I'd like better:
> Since subversion provides an own API for clients it
> should wrap such initializations (and all other calls
> which a client must make to underlying libraries)
> into own function calls. So apr_initialize() would
> become svn_initialize() and so documented in
> the subversion API headers.
>
> That way the programmer of a client doesn't have
> to dig into sourcecode just to find out which libraries
> are needed and which of them need initialization or
> other tweaking just to use subversion. And the client
> programmer can be sure that (s)he hasn't missed
> something.
this has been suggested before, and seems like a reasonable idea to me.
why don't you throw together a patch and send it to the list? it
doesn't seem like it would be that hard.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 11 20:34:27 2002