Re: svn commit: rev 3701 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:
> I would strongly suggest switching pool_cleanup to passing the parent
> pool to the svn__wc function and be done with it. Reverting the
> apr_xlate commit is only going to cause us to ignore the problem when
> we already have a suggested solution.

Justin, don't worry if it's temporarily reverted -- it'll get filed as
an issue, and the issue will be scheduled in a near milestone, and the
project has a very good track record with those. We're not going to
somehow forget about the problem.

If the solution is fast, can you post a patch?

If not, no big deal, we can live with the old (pre-3701) lossage for a
little bit longer. It's not like it suddenly became more severe by
being discovered :-).

(I'm not coding right now, I'm just able to check email at irregular
intervals, or I'd try the patch myself. As you can see, I haven't
even had time to revert and file the issue yet, so if you patch it
fast, maybe you'll beat me to it?)

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Nov 9 07:54:07 2002