Re: svn log -r

Jani Monoses wrote:
> I meant with -r without a revno, not without -r at all.

The -r option has a mandatory argument - and I think it is good that
the argument is mandatory. If it is optional, there is room for
ambiguous interpretation and mistakes.

Also, I'm not sure if the commandline parser would handle.

>> To get the last change :
>> svn diff target -rPREV:HEAD
>
> so it's great these work.Looks like what's missing is just syntactic
> sugaring and CVS resemblance.

CVS resemblance is mostly a good thing... but I would say that it is
better to have things said explicitly than assumed from arguments. It
is a bit more learning, but doesn't cause mistakes so easily and makes
the intent clean.

-- Naked

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 8 12:05:41 2002