Greg Hudson wrote:
> Since I think people have pretty much laid out the options:
>
> +1 on a --revision-prop (or whatever) option to the p* commands. I
> don't care whether it accepts a revision or if you have to use a
> separate -r. (The name --revision-prop suggests that it should
> behave like a flag rather than accepting a revision argument;
> perhaps there's another name which is more suggestive of accepting
> an argument.)
This does sound like the best solution yet. And I don't have a real
opinion either whether there's a separate revision argument or not.
> -0.5 on a unified "svn prop". I don't think we should get into the
> business of using options as subcommands instead of modifiers. If
> we really want hierarchical subcommands, we should think about "svn
> prop get", but I don't think that's really necessary.
After thinking about this myself for a while - I have to agree. If
there's a unified "svn prop", then it must be done with real
subcommands on the subcommand, not just flags. And unless we want
subcommands of subcommands and someone codes support for them, we can
just forget this option.
-- Naked
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 8 11:50:42 2002