[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Alternatives for remote access?

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2002-08-30 17:27:13 CEST

On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 11:19, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Since ra_local (and consequently ra_pipe) requires write access to
> the BDB files, if you don't like the ACLs, you can simply bring up
> python + BDB bindings and edit the repository.

ssh access can be restricted to running only the svn command.

It is also possible that, some day, we'll have a protocol along the
lines of the CVS pserver, with its own authentication (say, based on
SASL). ACLs would make sense in that realm too.

So, we shouldn't engineer ACLs so that they're purely dependent on DAV,
or assume that DAV will be the only access method which can meaningfully
have them.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 30 17:27:59 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.