[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: annotate vs blame

From: Hamilton Link <helink_at_sandia.gov>
Date: 2002-08-30 17:27:52 CEST

Brandon Ehle wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >More stew - 'svn linehistory'. It's not too nice or short, it carries
> >a reference to "lines" even though some day we are not line-based at
> >all, and so on. But it does carry a significant advantage over
> >everything else I've seen.
> >
> >It gives me the idea that I _will_ indeed see who changed what line
> >and when - none of the other choices have yet done that.
> >
> >Maybe this could be worked on a bit more?
> >
> >
> This sounds like the one! Just make an alias for "svn lh" even us lazy
> farts can live with it.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

+1 for linehistory and lh, IMO.

I had no idea what annotate or blame did (or blame, etiology, whodunit,
stratify, or anything else) until this email, now it's obvious. For
binary files I can even pretend lh stands for localhistory.

hl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 30 17:26:30 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.