Dave Cridland wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 18:17, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
>
>> * It's more descriptive. ("annotate" is counter-intuitive, really; it
>> sounds like a command to attach a note to a revision, or something.)
>>
>>
>
>Indeed, that's what I thought it was. The use of "svn blame" didn't help
>me in that misconception, since I assumed you were simply annotating to
>attach blame.
>
>I'd have called it "trace", really, but that's probably (as usual) just
>me.
>
>
I'm +1 for "svn whodunit"
On a serious note, I also feel that "svn blame" is just as
non-descriptive as "svn annotate". The database isn't really blaming
someone. "history" might be the best word, but that's a CVS word that
meant something completely different.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 29 23:14:35 2002