[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: annotate vs blame

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-29 21:50:27 CEST

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> writes:

> On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 18:17, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > * It's more descriptive. ("annotate" is counter-intuitive, really; it
> > sounds like a command to attach a note to a revision, or something.)
> Indeed, that's what I thought it was. The use of "svn blame" didn't help
> me in that misconception, since I assumed you were simply annotating to
> attach blame.
> I'd have called it "trace", really, but that's probably (as usual) just
> me.

But that would've been confused with 'cvs -t subcommand' ...

    -t Show trace of program execution -- try with -n.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 29 21:51:29 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.