Re: annotate vs blame

Noel Yap wrote:

>After looking through the FAQ and browsing through the
>archives, I didn't see this question, so here it goes:
>
>AFAIK, subversion attempts to have the same commands
>and functionality as CVS but it differs when it comes
>to "blame". So it begs the question, "Why was the
>'blame' command chosen over the more established (and,
>IMHO, less pessimistic) 'annotate' command?"
>
>

Ah, I think we should have an alias, "svn praise"! Then if you detect
major winnage, you run "svn praise", and if it's a total bork, you run
"svn blame". Commands should be descriptive and mnemonic. :-)

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org