[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: annotate vs blame

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-08-29 19:42:12 CEST

Noel Yap wrote:

>After looking through the FAQ and browsing through the
>archives, I didn't see this question, so here it goes:
>AFAIK, subversion attempts to have the same commands
>and functionality as CVS but it differs when it comes
>to "blame". So it begs the question, "Why was the
>'blame' command chosen over the more established (and,
>IMHO, less pessimistic) 'annotate' command?"

Ah, I think we should have an alias, "svn praise"! Then if you detect
major winnage, you run "svn praise", and if it's a total bork, you run
"svn blame". Commands should be descriptive and mnemonic. :-)

Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 29 19:42:53 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.