Re: Entries caching?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:49:28AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> - Add a caching-only API
> Status: Patches posted (if what I posted before doesn't cleanly
> apply, it'd be fairly easy to make it clean again).
> Pro: Allows us to incrementally address the API concerns without
> forcing to change the entirety of libsvn_wc.
> Con: Philip has stated he is very much against this. I believe he
> may have even vetoed this.
>

It would certainly be nice to be able to enjoy the benefits of entries
caching now, allowing the libsvn_wc rework to be scheduled for post-1.0,
rather than be stuck with a slow WC implementation.

First impressions of a product are hard to change, and while people
will overlook problems with an "alpha" product, they're likely to
judge 1.0 a bit more harshly.

I can see the benchmark comparison charts in my mind's eye already.

--ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Aug 11 20:18:34 2002