Re: merge should copy-with-history

Karl Fogel wrote:

>Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>>Exactly! We've essentially broken the fix for issue 838 into two
>>parts. Now that Philip's patch is in, and the semantics of merging
>>added files is correct, we can move issue 838 to a branch and do the
>>more complex stuff there.
>>
>>
>
>[Sorry, I got clearer in later mails than the one you're responding to
>above.]
>
>I'd totally agree, except for the fact that it broke merge *output*.
>
>

Uh ... is a temporary change in the output more important than correct
semantics?

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org