[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: merge should copy-with-history

From: William Uther <will+_at_cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 2002-08-08 23:14:35 CEST

On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 04:06 PM, Branko ╚ibej wrote:

> Exactly! We've essentially broken the fix for issue 838 into two parts.
> Now that Philip's patch is in, and the semantics of merging added files
> is correct, we can move issue 838 to a branch and do the more complex
> stuff there.

Are you sure these semantics are correct? I don't think so! I think
they are close - and it may not be worth getting them entirely correct
before 1.0. But I do not think they are entirely correct yet. I'm not
-1 on the change, just do it with your eyes open.

I just appended an example of my issue with the semantics to Issue #838.

later,

\x/ill :-}

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 8 23:16:07 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.