Re: Why svn:// isn't a good idea

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:29:32AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > > file:///path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> > > http://server.example.com/path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> > > postgres://postgres.example.com:port/svn-dbname?path=dir/foo
> > >
> > > But, I think using path info everywhere makes it cleaner and
> > > more precise. -- justin
> >
> > ++1
> >
> > i agree with everything justin has said here, and it quite clearly
> > sums up why i don't think we need to switch away from file://
>
> +1 here too.
>
> I'd like to hear something from Greg Stein first, though. I have a
> feeling he may -1, at least temporarily in order to explain something
> we haven't thought of.

I'd prefer (+0) that we switched to a different URI scheme since we've kind
of bastardized the "file" scheme. But I won't veto sticking with file:.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org