[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why svn:// isn't a good idea

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-01 17:29:32 CEST

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > file:///path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> > http://server.example.com/path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> > postgres://postgres.example.com:port/svn-dbname?path=dir/foo
> >
> > But, I think using path info everywhere makes it cleaner and
> > more precise. -- justin
> ++1
> i agree with everything justin has said here, and it quite clearly
> sums up why i don't think we need to switch away from file://

+1 here too.

I'd like to hear something from Greg Stein first, though. I have a
feeling he may -1, at least temporarily in order to explain something
we haven't thought of.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 17:44:21 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.