[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why svn:// isn't a good idea

From: Kieran <kieran_at_esperi.demon.co.uk>
Date: 2002-08-01 07:39:11 CEST

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:

>
> Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:
> > Yes, that means that file:// URLs may not map exactly to what
> > your web browser would like. But, I think it makes more sense
> > to have a canonical path-info strategy across ra implementations.
> > And, if you really wanted to be pedantic, I could support the
> > usage of:
>
> > file:///path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> > http://server.example.com/path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> > postgres://postgres.example.com:port/svn-dbname?path=dir/foo
>
> > But, I think using path info everywhere makes it cleaner and
> > more precise. -- justin
>
> +1
>
> I would say, yes, the point is taken that this isn't going to work
> 100% how people might expect, but lets put this discussion to bed.
>
> -Fitz, who's willing to call for a vote to bring this to an end.
>
+1 on the vote.

Regards

Kieran

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 08:01:47 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.