[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why svn:// isn't a good idea

From: B. W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2002-08-01 06:01:03 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:
> Yes, that means that file:// URLs may not map exactly to what
> your web browser would like. But, I think it makes more sense
> to have a canonical path-info strategy across ra implementations.
> And, if you really wanted to be pedantic, I could support the
> usage of:

> file:///path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> http://server.example.com/path/to/repos?path=dir/foo
> postgres://postgres.example.com:port/svn-dbname?path=dir/foo

> But, I think using path info everywhere makes it cleaner and
> more precise. -- justin


I would say, yes, the point is taken that this isn't going to work
100% how people might expect, but lets put this discussion to bed.

-Fitz, who's willing to call for a vote to bring this to an end.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 1 06:01:54 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.