Re: "svn ls" too complex?

On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 01:53:45PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:33:18AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > > i'd be in favor of having the current behaviour be the 'svn ls -l'
> > > variant, and having the default just list the filenames.
> > >
> > > would anyone have a problem with that? if not i'll change it tonight.
> >
> > We don't support subcommand-specific options.
> >
> > CMike's suggestion to use -v seems good to me, though.
>
> sounds like a plan. i'll make the change tonight.

i just committed this change in revision 2786. let me know what you
guys think.

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                    Remember, any design flaw you're 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net      sufficiently snide about becomes  
http://electricjellyfish.net/     a feature.       -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org