[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: argh

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2002-07-26 12:45:57 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:

> > Yes, I agree that checkout should accept multiple URLs, but dropping
> > the -d is a step forward.
> My request was to make it optional - I don't see why it has to be
> dropped entirely. And, this report just reinforces my thought
> that people are going to expect the CVS syntax regardless of
> what we say. -- justin

Can't we just make it "do the right thing"? How about this

- case 1: one URL
  $ svn co http://host/repos/module
  checkout into ./module/

- case 2: one URL and explicit path
  $ svn co http://host/repos/module path
  checkout into ./path/

- case 3: multiple URLs
  $ svn co http://host1/repos1/module1 http://host2/repos2/module2
  checkout into ./module1/ and ./module2/

- case 4: multiple URLs and explicit path
  $ svn co http://host1/repos1/module1 http://host2/repos2/module2 path
  checkout into ./path/module1/ and ./path/module2/

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 26 12:46:34 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.