Re: argh

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:

> > Yes, I agree that checkout should accept multiple URLs, but dropping
> > the -d is a step forward.
>
> My request was to make it optional - I don't see why it has to be
> dropped entirely. And, this report just reinforces my thought
> that people are going to expect the CVS syntax regardless of
> what we say. -- justin

Can't we just make it "do the right thing"? How about this

- case 1: one URL
  $ svn co http://host/repos/module
  checkout into ./module/

- case 2: one URL and explicit path
  $ svn co http://host/repos/module path
  checkout into ./path/

- case 3: multiple URLs
  $ svn co http://host1/repos1/module1 http://host2/repos2/module2
  checkout into ./module1/ and ./module2/

- case 4: multiple URLs and explicit path
  $ svn co http://host1/repos1/module1 http://host2/repos2/module2 path
  checkout into ./path/module1/ and ./path/module2/

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org