> From: Philip Martin [mailto:pm@localhost.striker.xs4all.nl]On Behalf Of
> Philip Martin
> Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:
>
> > > Yes, I agree that checkout should accept multiple URLs, but dropping
> > > the -d is a step forward.
> >
> > My request was to make it optional - I don't see why it has to be
> > dropped entirely. And, this report just reinforces my thought
> > that people are going to expect the CVS syntax regardless of
> > what we say. -- justin
>
> Can't we just make it "do the right thing"? How about this
>
> - case 1: one URL
> $ svn co http://host/repos/module
> checkout into ./module/
>
> - case 2: one URL and explicit path
> $ svn co http://host/repos/module path
> checkout into ./path/
>
> - case 3: multiple URLs
> $ svn co http://host1/repos1/module1 http://host2/repos2/module2
> checkout into ./module1/ and ./module2/
>
> - case 4: multiple URLs and explicit path
> $ svn co http://host1/repos1/module1 http://host2/repos2/module2 path
> checkout into ./path/module1/ and ./path/module2/
+1 for this approach.
Sander
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 26 13:15:42 2002