[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: argh

From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz_at_apache.org>
Date: 2002-07-26 01:01:01 CEST

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:57:11PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> As a non-CVS user I maintain that the previous syntax was confusing :-)
> $ svn merge -rN:M URL PATH
> $ svn switch -rN URL PATH
> $ svn copy -rN URL PATH
> $ svn checkout -rN URL -d PATH # wtf!
> Yes, I agree that checkout should accept multiple URLs, but dropping
> the -d is a step forward.

My request was to make it optional - I don't see why it has to be
dropped entirely. And, this report just reinforces my thought
that people are going to expect the CVS syntax regardless of
what we say. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 26 01:01:38 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.