Re: [PATCH] Move up declaration of svn_wc_adm_access_t?

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:59:16PM -0400, Kevin Pilch-Bisson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > Would anyone have a problem if I move the svn_wc_adm_access_t
> > declaration and functions to the top of svn_wc.h? In order to use
> > the baton in svn_wc calls, it has to be declared first. -- justin
>
> I'd rather changed the functions that need it to take a void * (or maybe an
> incomplete type, and keep the details out of the public header personally.

There's a problem with that as the svn_wc_entry is going to need
to know the internals of this structure (as it needs to populate
the cache).

So, I don't think we'll be able to get away with just confining the
real structure to lock.c as entries.c will need it too. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 11 20:18:17 2002