Re: [PATCH] Move up declaration of svn_wc_adm_access_t?

Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
> > Would anyone have a problem if I move the svn_wc_adm_access_t
> > declaration and functions to the top of svn_wc.h? In order to use
> > the baton in svn_wc calls, it has to be declared first. -- justin
>
> I'd rather changed the functions that need it to take a void * (or maybe an
> incomplete type, and keep the details out of the public header personally.

An incomplete type (so we can still get the type checking, while
having opacity).

I think Philip was okay with making this opaque, btw... I'd say, go
for it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 11 20:15:47 2002