Re: [PATCH] Move up declaration of svn_wc_adm_access_t?

Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:58:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > Would anyone have a problem if I move the svn_wc_adm_access_t
> > declaration and functions to the top of svn_wc.h? In order to use
> > the baton in svn_wc calls, it has to be declared first. -- justin
>
> I'd rather changed the functions that need it to take a void * (or maybe an
> incomplete type, and keep the details out of the public header personally.

I'm working on next step in issue 749. As a side effect it moves them
up, and makes svn_wc_adm_access_t incomplete. I plan to commit it
later today.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org