Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-07-10 22:11:11 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:
> I know cmpilato isn't a fan of this, but I'm going to post this
> for completeness-sake. If it goes in, yea. If not, it is here for
> all to use even if cmpilato vetoes it. -- justin

Just asking: it passes "make check", right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 10 22:22:07 2002

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Karl Fogel: "Re: how to set svn:ignore to more than one pattern?"
Previous message: Alexis Huxley: "how to set svn:ignore to more than one pattern?"
In reply to: Justin Erenkrantz: "[PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"
Next in thread: Philip Martin: "Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]