Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2002-07-10 22:31:06 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org> writes:

> + "usage: revert TARGET1 [TARGET2 [TARGET3 ... ]]\n"
> + " Unless --recursive is passed, revert does not have an implicit\n"
> + " target. Therefore, you must explicitly specify any targets\n"
> + " (such as `.').\n\n"

We try to protect the user against "svn revert" errors but allow the
more destructive "svn revert --recursive" to run unhindered. I don't
understand the logic behind this behaviour.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Wed Jul 10 22:31:37 2002

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Collins: "Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"
Previous message: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: how to set svn:ignore to more than one pattern?"
In reply to: Justin Erenkrantz: "[PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"
Next in thread: Ben Collins: "Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"
Reply: Ben Collins: "Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"
Reply: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: [PATCH] Allow revert --recursive to have implict dot-target"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]