Re: RFC: a human-eye date format everyone can love
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-06-24 21:07:36 CEST
Kevin Pilch-Bisson <kevin@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
Sure, +1 with or without the year (I don't feel strongly either way).
It's getting a bit long, though. Here's some sample log output:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* CHANGES: reformatting so that each change is one line. No offense
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you _still_ want the year in the second portion? :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.