[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: problem arising from early entry deletion

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-03-18 22:39:03 CET

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> > /me needs make sure he understands what we're talking about here.
> >
> > You're advocating this:
> >
> > copy into the txn revision X of dir
> > if (dir is dirty):
> > remove all of X's children
> > foreach child of X the working copy has:
> > add back the child to X
> >
> > versus the old 'deleted flag' way:
> >
> > copy in revision X of dir
> > foreach child of X the working doesn't have:
> > remove child
> >
> > Do I appear to understand both methods properly?
>
> Yes, you do.

Then -1. I like the old way (with some tweaks, see my other mail).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Mar 18 22:41:54 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.