Re: [PATCH] Reworking INSTALL

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 05:16:49PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > actually, it turns out i was mistaken. i just tried to build without
> > neon, and configure bails out. personally, this seems wrong to me...
> > is there any reason we're doing things this way? what's wrong with
> > building a version of svn without ra_dav? it just seems arbitrary,
> > especialy since we do allow you to build without ra_local.
>
> It should be allowed, but not too much attention has been paid to that
> ability, since for most people it's far more useful to have ra_dav
> only than ra_local only.
>
> I don't know what's involved in making it build, you're in a better
> position to say...

well, i spent a little while looking at this problem, and configure.in
scared me away. i imagine this is probably something that isn't too
hard to fix, for one who has some knowledge of autoconf, but i am not
one of those people.

i've filed an issue (number 617) about it though, so at least we won't
forget.

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                     Unix was not designed to stop you from 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net       doing stupid things, because that would  
http://electricjellyfish.net/      stop you from doing clever things.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org