Re: [PATCH] Reworking INSTALL

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> actually, it turns out i was mistaken. i just tried to build without
> neon, and configure bails out. personally, this seems wrong to me...
> is there any reason we're doing things this way? what's wrong with
> building a version of svn without ra_dav? it just seems arbitrary,
> especialy since we do allow you to build without ra_local.

It should be allowed, but not too much attention has been paid to that
ability, since for most people it's far more useful to have ra_dav
only than ra_local only.

I don't know what's involved in making it build, you're in a better
position to say...

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:37:01 2006