[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

VOTE (and current summary)

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2001-09-25 04:48:11 CEST

For those that haven't voted, please continue to send in your vote. The
question is:

   Should all status output show the same (or very similar format),
   that is, always including the local revision number? Or should the
   default not show the local rev, and you get the rev when you invoke
   st --verbose, which also happens to list all entries?
   [ ] Yes, always include the local rev.

   [ ] No, the local rev is usually a distraction, please show it
         only with --verbose.

Check one box, and send your reply back to the list.

[ and make sure you've read the "svn status" threads over the past week ]


Option (1) (include local rev):

   Votes: Bill Tutt, Ben, Julian Fitzell, Karl(*)

          == 4 votes

Option (2) (short format):

   Votes: Daniel Stenberg, Branko, Sander, Joe, Paul Smith, Bruce
          Atherton, C. Mike, Kevin, Greg Stein

          == 9 votes

If I've recorded your vote wrong, or you wish to change it, then just send
another email to the list.


(*) Karl never explicitly voted, but I'm assuming he goes for (1).

Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.