[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: VOTE (and current summary)

From: Charles Wilson <pathfinder_at_acm.org>
Date: 2001-09-25 14:59:08 CEST

At 7:48 PM -0700 09/24/2001, Greg Stein wrote:
>For those that haven't voted, please continue to send in your vote. The
>question is:
> Should all status output show the same (or very similar format),
> that is, always including the local revision number? Or should the
> default not show the local rev, and you get the rev when you invoke
> st --verbose, which also happens to list all entries?
> [ ] Yes, always include the local rev.
> [x] No, the local rev is usually a distraction, please show it
> only with --verbose.
>Check one box, and send your reply back to the list.
>[ and make sure you've read the "svn status" threads over the past week ]

- charles
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:42 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.