[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: more svn_string changes?

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2001-06-12 18:50:54 CEST

cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> > I just realized that the function names may need to change. If we are going
> > to have functions that operate on svn_string_t or on svn_stringbuf_t, then
> > the function name probably should reflect which type they work on.
>
> +1 (so long as I'm not the one doing it. ;-) I was kinda hoping you'd
> go here next, Greg.

Yeah, I think this is in inevitable part of the change. We've got two
different data types here, so... :-)

Looking over the functions in svn_string.h, I don't see many that will
need to be implemented for both. Most of them will just switch to
"*_stringbuf_*" and wouldn't also need an svn_string_t version, except
for a few like svn_string<buf>_create, as you mentioned.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:31 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.