more svn_string changes?

Now that people have trained their hands to type "svn_stringbuf_t", I've got
more changes to make...

I just realized that the function names may need to change. If we are going
to have functions that operate on svn_string_t or on svn_stringbuf_t, then
the function name probably should reflect which type they work on.

For example:

    svn_stringbuf_create()
    
    svn_string_create() [ or maybe svn_string_alloc ]

This is another big change, but not so sure about it. I'm not sure that
we'll have a lot of functions for svn_string_t, so do we perturb the whole
namespace to clarify a few functions?

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org