Re: more svn_string changes?

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:50:54AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> > > I just realized that the function names may need to change. If we are going
> > > to have functions that operate on svn_string_t or on svn_stringbuf_t, then
> > > the function name probably should reflect which type they work on.
> >
> > +1 (so long as I'm not the one doing it. ;-) I was kinda hoping you'd
> > go here next, Greg.
>
> Yeah, I think this is in inevitable part of the change. We've got two
> different data types here, so... :-)
>
> Looking over the functions in svn_string.h, I don't see many that will
> need to be implemented for both. Most of them will just switch to
> "*_stringbuf_*" and wouldn't also need an svn_string_t version, except
> for a few like svn_string<buf>_create, as you mentioned.

I think that makes two +1 votes. I'll rig up this change later tonite.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org