SVN type concerns

While working in the FS code, I noticed that there are several
question functions with return values of 'int' as opposed to the
(IMHO) more semantically accurate 'svn_boolean_t'. Any comments about
this sort of thing? I'm tempted to blast through there and change
them, but am willing to live with it if there is a sound reason behind
the status quo.

Coming from a Windows Hungarian-notation world where variable names
tell you everything you want to know about types, and into a world
where types themselves take on more emphasis (and variable names are
rather mundane), I'm not qualified to make a value judgment on this
topic.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:23 2006