Re: property names

I'll skip answering the rest because Karl just beat me to it and he
esplaind oh so much better than I could. So ...

Greg Stein wrote:

> However... Where is DAV impinging on SVN? Back that one up, or drop the
> FUD... :-)
>
> I have been striving quite diligently to keep DAV from impacting SVN (since
> *March*, when I first proposed it to Karl). And if you really want to know,
> I'm planning on using a custom "report" between the client and the server
> which will effectively blast away any chance of interoperability with other
> DAV clients/servers. That can be remedied (a bit expensively) in the future.
> But for 1.0, we're taking the shortcut (and using stuff not in the DAV
> specs) to avoid impacts on SVN.
>
> Where do you see DAV affecting SVN's design?

This is what I understood from your posts: "DAV uses URIs for property
names, therefore Subversion should use URIs for property names."
Everything else was mostly finding arguments for that.

I may have misunderstood you. If so, I apologize.

However, I still disagree. :-)

-- 
Brane �ibej
    home:   <brane_at_xbc.nu>             http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
    work:   <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>   http://www.hermes-softlab.com/
     ACM:   <brane_at_acm.org>            http://www.acm.org/