Branko =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=C8ibej?= <email@example.com> writes:
> I wonder. CVS is GPL; Subversion isn't. From what I've heard, RMS is
> very pedantic about such things; he might decide that Subversion's
> licence makes it inappropriate for use by the GNU project.
That doesn't match what I know about Stallman's attitude. He prefers
the GPL to any other free software license (heck, so do I), but still
considers the others to be free software as long as they're compliant
with the Debian Free Software Guidelines, and therefore suitable for
use by the GNU project.
They must be using plenty of software over there which is not GPL'd.
Apache, for one! :-)
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:17 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev