Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?

Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Dave Glowacki wrote:
> > If I am worried about it, I use '-n' and if I forget and get a
> > conflict, I just figure that it's a problem I'd have run into
> > eventually.
>
> Yeah thats probably true, but if you're just wanting to query
> changes merges just shouldn't happen.
>
> (On the other side, doing an update should tell you that its
> merged things..)

Sounds like we're basically in agreement, then.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:13 2006