Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?

From: Steve Kemp <skx_at_tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 2000-10-27 17:10:55 CEST

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Dave Glowacki wrote:

> So do you want something similar to 'cvs -n update' or are
> you thinking of something totally different?

Something similar to that yes.
I was just being a bit pedantic really .. I'm assuming that you
really mean "-n update" when you were saying "update".

> If I am worried about it, I use '-n' and if I forget and get a
> conflict, I just figure that it's a problem I'd have run into
> eventually.

Yeah thats probably true, but if you're just wanting to query
changes merges just shouldn't happen.

(On the other side, doing an update should tell you that its
merged things..)

Steve

---

Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:13 2006