Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?
From: Lee Burgess <lefty_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2000-10-27 17:54:19 CEST
Steve Kemp writes:
> No, I don't think its silly.
Just my $0.02:
I usually just do a 'cvs diff' to see what files have changed. If I
cvs -q diff | grep RCS
This is obviously only a slightly different method than running cvs
I think Matt B's point is well taken that this is a something the
I personally disagree with the idea of using cvs update to see that
However, I also agree that it would be nice if cvs (svn) status had a
Rather than having a new command "svn changes", why not just have some
-- Lee P. W. Burgess <<!>> Manipulate eternity. Power is a symphony: Programmer <<!>> elaborate, enormous, essential. Red Bean Software <<!>> Dream the moment with a fiddle in summer firstname.lastname@example.org <<!>> and a knife in winter.Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:13 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.