Re: volunteer for the command-line client?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:57:33PM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > >From what you've said, it seems like an awfully big hammer, although
> > it does solve the problem of keeping usage messages consistent with
> > program options.
> >
> > I'm still planning to write an apr_getopt_long, incidentally.
>
> That would be nice -- then we could avoid dependence on Yet Another
> Outside Library.

No problem with that approach!

There was definitely interest in the Apache group. They were surprised that
apr_getopt() didn't already handle long opts.

Provide the patch for APR, and I can apply it :-)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/