Re: volunteer for the command-line client?

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> >From what you've said, it seems like an awfully big hammer, although
> it does solve the problem of keeping usage messages consistent with
> program options.
>
> I'm still planning to write an apr_getopt_long, incidentally.

That would be nice -- then we could avoid dependence on Yet Another
Outside Library.

Just my $0.02,
-K
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:11 2006